Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
reversion explained
Line 519: Line 519:     
:: The current statement is correct in the entry and we do not delete correct, educational information here.  You cite some interesting articles which could also be added if they are given detail and explanation suitable for a high-quality encyclopedia.  I took a quick look at your articles and they seem to be designed for public consumption, lacking satisfactory detail of a scientific level.  But feel free to add a paragraph '''without exaggeration''' that explains clearly what you think these experiments demonstrate.  In Christ,--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:55, 5 August 2007 (EDT)
 
:: The current statement is correct in the entry and we do not delete correct, educational information here.  You cite some interesting articles which could also be added if they are given detail and explanation suitable for a high-quality encyclopedia.  I took a quick look at your articles and they seem to be designed for public consumption, lacking satisfactory detail of a scientific level.  But feel free to add a paragraph '''without exaggeration''' that explains clearly what you think these experiments demonstrate.  In Christ,--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:55, 5 August 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Reversion explained ==
 +
 +
The [[libera]] edits and censorship have been reverted. This is not [[Wikipedia]].--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:04, 17 December 2007 (EST)
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794

edits

Navigation menu