Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 13:41, December 18, 2007

480 bytes added ,  13:41, December 18, 2007
→‎#2 (Prodigal Son): reply
Line 378: Line 378:  
--[[User:LutherBifteck|LutherBifteck]] 19:46, 8 November 2007 (EST)
 
--[[User:LutherBifteck|LutherBifteck]] 19:46, 8 November 2007 (EST)
    +
: No, most of the entries on the list are not trivial.  It does not even talk much about the vast percentage of [[Wikipedia]] entries that are silly rock bands or obscure places, for example.
 +
 +
: [[Wikipedia]] has changed many of its entries in response to this list, and perhaps the [[Prodigal Son]] was one of them.  I'll look into this further.  I'm sure our point about the [[Prodigal Son]] was correct when written.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 08:41, 18 December 2007 (EST)
    
==Seigenthaler controversy==
 
==Seigenthaler controversy==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,393

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/354062"

Navigation menu