Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 188: Line 188:     
:::I have taken a good look around. And it gives itself credibility to the audience that it targets, conservatives.  The wackiness that you're using "conservatism" as if it were immediately a bad thing is completely stupid.  I though liberals were supposed to be smarter than conservatives? Apparently, you're not because you refuse to believe any evidence presented by this site.  You start immediately with a bias that this place is bad, simply because it's "conservative". God give me strength... you need some help. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 22:33, 18 December 2007 (EST)
 
:::I have taken a good look around. And it gives itself credibility to the audience that it targets, conservatives.  The wackiness that you're using "conservatism" as if it were immediately a bad thing is completely stupid.  I though liberals were supposed to be smarter than conservatives? Apparently, you're not because you refuse to believe any evidence presented by this site.  You start immediately with a bias that this place is bad, simply because it's "conservative". God give me strength... you need some help. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 22:33, 18 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
::::Actually, I did not come here with a view that this place is bad because it's conservative.  Having a look round this place gave me that view.  [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 23:02, 18 December 2007 (EST)
117

edits

Navigation menu