117
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 172:
Line 172: + +
Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (view source)
Revision as of 04:49, December 19, 2007
, 04:49, December 19, 2007→The Annals of the World
The fact that you reject the Bible as truth, shows that you have no meaningful comment to give on this site... now, if only I could block. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 23:44, 18 December 2007 (EST)
The fact that you reject the Bible as truth, shows that you have no meaningful comment to give on this site... now, if only I could block. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 23:44, 18 December 2007 (EST)
:Well, unless this site changes to 'christianfundametalopedia.com', then the fact I do not accept the Bible as absolute proof without evidence is completely irrelevant, quite frankly. Or should be, anyway. [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 23:49, 18 December 2007 (EST)
==When liberals spend time refuting an idea ... it's already a success==
==When liberals spend time refuting an idea ... it's already a success==