104
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 174:
Line 174: + +
Debate:Can Conservapedia Succeed? (view source)
Revision as of 04:54, December 19, 2007
, 04:54, December 19, 2007→The Annals of the World: go away
:Well, unless this site changes to 'christianfundamentalopedia.com', then the fact I do not accept the Bible as absolute proof without evidence is completely irrelevant, quite frankly. Or should be, anyway. [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 23:49, 18 December 2007 (EST)
:Well, unless this site changes to 'christianfundamentalopedia.com', then the fact I do not accept the Bible as absolute proof without evidence is completely irrelevant, quite frankly. Or should be, anyway. [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 23:49, 18 December 2007 (EST)
::The name of the site is irrelevant. Unless wikipedia changes it's name to "ifyoudontlikesciencegoawayapedia" then Conservapedia would consider changing their name. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 23:54, 18 December 2007 (EST)
==When liberals spend time refuting an idea ... it's already a success==
==When liberals spend time refuting an idea ... it's already a success==