117
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + +
no edit summary
* *sigh* you are only escalating aggressions between liberals and the conservatives at this site beyond where it already is. Just really, shut up, you're not helping anything, you're only stirring things up, and it makes you look TOTALLY stupid that you refuse to argue outside of your own biased viewpoint. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 00:20, 19 December 2007 (EST)
* *sigh* you are only escalating aggressions between liberals and the conservatives at this site beyond where it already is. Just really, shut up, you're not helping anything, you're only stirring things up, and it makes you look TOTALLY stupid that you refuse to argue outside of your own biased viewpoint. --[[User:Puellanivis|Puellanivis]] 00:20, 19 December 2007 (EST)
:Really? I am 'escalating' aggressions by pointing out that deleting the factual phrase 'Christians believe that this is true', and replacing it with the opiniated one of 'this is definitely true' is in contravention of the site's own rules? [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 10:26, 19 December 2007 (EST)
:Hey, be nice now... After all, it's only a debate. Debates are a) the proper place (if any) for those sort of posts, and b) hardly ever payed attention to anyway! Zmidponk, you're not at fault here. But certainly, Puellanivis, if you see any unhelpful and biased posts in the ''article'' talk spaces, feel free to point it out to the user. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 00:36, 19 December 2007 (EST)
:Hey, be nice now... After all, it's only a debate. Debates are a) the proper place (if any) for those sort of posts, and b) hardly ever payed attention to anyway! Zmidponk, you're not at fault here. But certainly, Puellanivis, if you see any unhelpful and biased posts in the ''article'' talk spaces, feel free to point it out to the user. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 00:36, 19 December 2007 (EST)
::That is true, but he is in violation of the 90/10 rule. Andy wants people to make positive contributions more than just using this site as a soapbox. It would be nice to see some edits. There are many noncontroversial topics that could be augmented or created. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 00:41, 19 December 2007 (EST)
::That is true, but he is in violation of the 90/10 rule. Andy wants people to make positive contributions more than just using this site as a soapbox. It would be nice to see some edits. There are many noncontroversial topics that could be augmented or created. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 00:41, 19 December 2007 (EST)
:::Unfortunately, it is the 'controversial' pages that need editing to conform to the rules of this site, and, for the most part, they are locked, so they can't be edited. Which is what I'm pointing out. I can't see how it can be called 'using this site as a soapbox' to ask it to conform to it's own rules. [[User:Zmidponk|Zmidponk]] 10:26, 19 December 2007 (EST)