Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
510 bytes added ,  14:52, December 21, 2007
Line 33: Line 33:  
::Just looking at the numbers of edits[http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Puellanivis], Puellanivis is not in violation of the 90/10 rule.  50% of his total edits are in mainspace, and last time I checked 50% was greater than 10%!  Andy is not in violation either.[http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Aschlafly]  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:05, 19 December 2007 (EST)
 
::Just looking at the numbers of edits[http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Puellanivis], Puellanivis is not in violation of the 90/10 rule.  50% of his total edits are in mainspace, and last time I checked 50% was greater than 10%!  Andy is not in violation either.[http://faleg.org/cgi-bin/conservapedia/editcounter_Tool1?username=Aschlafly]  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 21:05, 19 December 2007 (EST)
 
:::A little trick I've learned in life is to never trust summary screens when the data can be personally viewed.  Do debate articles count in mainspace?  I reviewed the data myself before making my assessment including looking at the quality of edits to actual articles.  For instance his reverting Andy here [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_relativity&diff=prev&oldid=354658] counts as a mainspace edit, but I didn't count it as such.  I was looking specifically for new information added by the user, and found it to be wanting. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:33, 20 December 2007 (EST)
 
:::A little trick I've learned in life is to never trust summary screens when the data can be personally viewed.  Do debate articles count in mainspace?  I reviewed the data myself before making my assessment including looking at the quality of edits to actual articles.  For instance his reverting Andy here [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Theory_of_relativity&diff=prev&oldid=354658] counts as a mainspace edit, but I didn't count it as such.  I was looking specifically for new information added by the user, and found it to be wanting. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:33, 20 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
:Please, we do not need your Liberal agenda polluting the minds of our children here. If you do not wish to contribute [[Logical Fallacy|Quality Articles]] here, perhaps you should go to [[Wikipedia]], where their [[Liberal]] [[Deceit]] would welcome you. Please, please do not add [[Typical Conservapedia Articles|Inferior Articles]] to this rapidly growing website. Do not dare to make our glorious leader into a hypocryte. He is always right and never wrong. [[User:Jay|Jay]] 09:52, 21 December 2007 (EST)
13

edits

Navigation menu