2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 743:
Line 743: + + +
→Atheist Science
: Repeatable testing is part of the scientific method, which I've said can't be used on past events, such as the writing of the books you mentioned, so I don't see why you would ask me for such tests of them.
: Repeatable testing is part of the scientific method, which I've said can't be used on past events, such as the writing of the books you mentioned, so I don't see why you would ask me for such tests of them.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:19, 21 December 2007 (EST)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 08:19, 21 December 2007 (EST)
Of course you would like to show where Spong is wrong, but even if he is wrong, that won't make your position right. You might be more inclined to accept the work of the Creation Study Group of the Presbyterian Church, in particular their observation that different views and interpretation go back to eve before Christ.
Thanks for pointing me to a creation website trying to prove a scientific theory to be wrong. You quoting it proves that even you believe that this scientific position is falsifiable. Which cannot be said by your admission about your interpretation of the scripture. I did ask you to come up with a test, because you ask this from people who disagree with you. If criticize theories about the past for not being testable, you beeter make sure that you own theories are testable. [[User:Order|Order]] 12:11, 21 December 2007 (EST)
===Legitimate views===
===Legitimate views===