Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: − +
Debate:Should all access to Conservapedia be banned on Sundays? (view source)
Revision as of 20:59, December 22, 2007
, 20:59, December 22, 2007grammar
First Jesus made His remarks in the context of a situation that required urgency, secondly it would not be appropriate to enforce a one-size-fits all policy on an issue like this; it should be left to the individual. [[User:Qwestor|Qwestor]] 15:51, 22 December 2007 (EST)
First Jesus made His remarks in the context of a situation that required urgency, secondly it would not be appropriate to enforce a one-size-fits all policy on an issue like this; it should be left to the individual. [[User:Qwestor|Qwestor]] 15:51, 22 December 2007 (EST)
: Right, it's up to the individual. For most of us, Conservapedia is enjoyment. I don't think hobbies and enjoyment has ever been banned on the Sabbath. Some small sects do ban the use of technology, such as automobiles, on the Sabbath.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:59, 22 December 2007 (EST)
: Right, it's up to the individual. For most of us, Conservapedia is enjoyment. I don't think hobbies and enjoyment have ever been banned on the Sabbath. Some small sects do ban the use of technology, such as automobiles, on the Sabbath.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:59, 22 December 2007 (EST)