Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
39 bytes added ,  05:11, December 27, 2007
Reference section/form, Category (capitalization)
Line 5: Line 5:  
He developed five proofs for the existence of [[God]] using logic.  The first three were "cosmological" proofs rather than the "ontological" approach of [[St. Anselm]].  A cosmological proof deals with the natural order of the universe.  Aquinas' most famous cosmological argument was that whatever is in motion (for example, us) must have been put in motion by something else (our parents).  They, in turn, must have been put in motion by something else (their parents).  But this sequence cannot go on to infinity.  There must have been a first mover.  This we call "God".   
 
He developed five proofs for the existence of [[God]] using logic.  The first three were "cosmological" proofs rather than the "ontological" approach of [[St. Anselm]].  A cosmological proof deals with the natural order of the universe.  Aquinas' most famous cosmological argument was that whatever is in motion (for example, us) must have been put in motion by something else (our parents).  They, in turn, must have been put in motion by something else (their parents).  But this sequence cannot go on to infinity.  There must have been a first mover.  This we call "God".   
   −
St. Thomas Aquinas' views on the nature of man included an incomplete interpretation of the [[Fall of Man]].  He believed that while men had rebelled against God and the human will was fallen, the human intellect remained perfect.  Therefore, human wisdom could be relied upon and given as much prominence as the teachings of the [[Bible]].  This idea justified mixing the works of the classical, secular philosophers into Christian theology.  Charles Murray wrote, "Aquinas made the case, eventually adopted by the Church, that human intelligence is a gift from God, and that to apply human intelligence to understanding the world is not an affront to God but is pleasing to him." [http://www.amconmag.com/11_17_03/review.html]
+
St. Thomas Aquinas' views on the nature of man included an incomplete interpretation of the [[Fall of Man]].  He believed that while men had rebelled against God and the human will was fallen, the human intellect remained perfect.  Therefore, human wisdom could be relied upon and given as much prominence as the teachings of the [[Bible]].  This idea justified mixing the works of the classical, secular philosophers into Christian theology.  Charles Murray wrote, "Aquinas made the case, eventually adopted by the Church, that human intelligence is a gift from God, and that to apply human intelligence to understanding the world is not an affront to God but is pleasing to him." <ref>http://www.amconmag.com/11_17_03/review.html</ref>
    
Also as a result, the authority of the Church became as important, if not more so, than that of the Bible.  These ideas set the stage for humanism, which was the predominant philosophy of the [[Renaissance]].  
 
Also as a result, the authority of the Church became as important, if not more so, than that of the Bible.  These ideas set the stage for humanism, which was the predominant philosophy of the [[Renaissance]].  
Line 19: Line 19:  
St. Thomas Aquinas is further known for his famous observation that the [[Devil]] cannot withstand mockery.
 
St. Thomas Aquinas is further known for his famous observation that the [[Devil]] cannot withstand mockery.
   −
{{DEFAULTSORT:Aquinas, St. Thomas }}
+
==References==
   −
[[Category:Catholic leaders]]
+
<References/>
    
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
*[http://www.amconmag.com/11_17_03/review.html Culture's Bell Curve] - a review of [[Charles Murray]]'s ''[[Human Accomplishment]]
 
*[http://www.amconmag.com/11_17_03/review.html Culture's Bell Curve] - a review of [[Charles Murray]]'s ''[[Human Accomplishment]]
 +
 +
{{DEFAULTSORT:Aquinas, St. Thomas}}
 +
 +
[[Category:Catholic Leaders]]
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu