22
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 176:
Line 176: + +
no edit summary
:For now, I'll leave it up to other editors (who acually have the abilities to make changes) to decide how authoritative such a source is, and how well the unattributed quote merits inclusion in the article. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 21:21, 14 December 2007 (EST)
:For now, I'll leave it up to other editors (who acually have the abilities to make changes) to decide how authoritative such a source is, and how well the unattributed quote merits inclusion in the article. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 21:21, 14 December 2007 (EST)
::That's ridiculous. That quote isn't even remotely based in fact. A statement like that should at the very, very least point to some bills that he advocated that promoted gay rights or '''something.''' I would highly suggest removal of the line, especially in light of the "trustworthy" claim in this "encyclopedia's" tagline. [[User:Lolsardcloth|Lolsardcloth]] 13:46, 22 December 2007 (EST)
::That's ridiculous. That quote isn't even remotely based in fact. A statement like that should at the very, very least point to some bills that he advocated that promoted gay rights or '''something.''' I would highly suggest removal of the line, especially in light of the "trustworthy" claim in this "encyclopedia's" tagline. [[User:Lolsardcloth|Lolsardcloth]] 13:46, 22 December 2007 (EST)
I'd like to note, as one of the major tenets of the article is "Clinton was an advocate of homosexuality", you might want to note that this is a false statement. You may be quick to note that this in fact is true, but you aren't reading the sentence carefully enough. You may, instead, want to mention that he was a advocate of homosexual tolerance and acceptance.