Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Evolutionists claim
Line 2: Line 2:     
In the first case, [[evolutionists]] argue that Creation Science and Intelligent Design should not be taught in the public schools because it is fundamentally [[religion|religious]] in nature and not science.
 
In the first case, [[evolutionists]] argue that Creation Science and Intelligent Design should not be taught in the public schools because it is fundamentally [[religion|religious]] in nature and not science.
Rather, they are thinly-disguised schemes to introduce religion to the classroom.
+
Evolutionists claim they are thinly-disguised schemes to introduce religion to the classroom.
 
In the United States, recent court decisions have affirmed this position, consistently barring the introduction of Creation Science and Intelligent Design into public science curricula.
 
In the United States, recent court decisions have affirmed this position, consistently barring the introduction of Creation Science and Intelligent Design into public science curricula.
  
20

edits

Navigation menu