nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 13:
Line 13: + + + + + + + +
Talk:Creation vs. evolution debate (view source)
Revision as of 07:47, December 28, 2007
, 07:47, December 28, 2007Evolution from monkeys
:Thanks. I do want to go over the article more to remove unfortunate use of tone that will appear to be forcing the reader to make up his or her mind in a certain way. On the other hand, I do not want to exclude aspects of the controversy that are glossed over by staunch evoluitionists, such as the less flattering motives and methods of some prominent Darwinian and Evolutionary promoters. [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 02:28, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
:Thanks. I do want to go over the article more to remove unfortunate use of tone that will appear to be forcing the reader to make up his or her mind in a certain way. On the other hand, I do not want to exclude aspects of the controversy that are glossed over by staunch evoluitionists, such as the less flattering motives and methods of some prominent Darwinian and Evolutionary promoters. [[User:HeartOfGold|HeartOfGold]] 02:28, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
== Evolution from monkeys ==
SimonA changed "...textbooks teaching that man evolved from monkeys in accordance with Charles Darwin's theory ..." to "...textbooks teaching that man evolved from monkeys, in ''what was believed to be'' accordance with Charles Darwin's theory ..." (my emphasis).
If he is saying that Darwin didn't teach that man evolved from ''monkeys'', per se, then I'll accept that he is probably correct. But did the textbooks say "''monkeys''"? The point is, I'm wondering if the edit was merely a technicality that would be better fixed in a different way. At the moment, it ''implies'' that Darwin's theory ''doesn't'' propose that man evolved from an ape-like creature, which it clearly does.
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:47, 28 December 2007 (EST)