Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 509: Line 509:  
At least Wikipedia is biased in all directions, and not just trying to do it along one single political agenda.  Everyone can edit articles there to say whatever they want.  If there's a majority of users who think a certain way then sure their own beliefs are going to be pandered to more.  What stops you helping make their site better?[[User:User1601|User1601]] 10:49, 28 December 2007 (EST)
 
At least Wikipedia is biased in all directions, and not just trying to do it along one single political agenda.  Everyone can edit articles there to say whatever they want.  If there's a majority of users who think a certain way then sure their own beliefs are going to be pandered to more.  What stops you helping make their site better?[[User:User1601|User1601]] 10:49, 28 December 2007 (EST)
 
: A lie supported by a majority does not make it true. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 10:56, 28 December 2007 (EST)
 
: A lie supported by a majority does not make it true. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 10:56, 28 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
: User1601, [[Wikipedia]] is '''not''' "biased in all directions."  Rather, it has an overwhelming bias in one direction.  The examples here confirm that.  Several of the examples illustrate how attempts to edit [[Wikipedia]] to correct its bias are futile - in response, the [[liberal]] mob and bullies who run [[Wikipedia]] will restore the bias or even make it worse!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:59, 28 December 2007 (EST)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,936

edits

Navigation menu