5,580
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + + + +
no edit summary
I wonder, is it wise to list examples of people pointing out Conservapedia's (percieved) flaws? Additionally, links 2, 3, and 4 are broken because they have been deleted. Lastly, why is this protected? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:19, 27 December 2007 (EST)
I wonder, is it wise to list examples of people pointing out Conservapedia's (percieved) flaws? Additionally, links 2, 3, and 4 are broken because they have been deleted. Lastly, why is this protected? [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 16:19, 27 December 2007 (EST)
:First, It ''is'' appropriate to list examples of Conservapedia editors using the Parthian shot; Second, the links are fixed; Third, the article is now unprotected. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 00:53, 28 December 2007 (EST)
:First, It ''is'' appropriate to list examples of Conservapedia editors using the Parthian shot; Second, the links are fixed; Third, the article is now unprotected. --[[User:Crocoite|Crocoite]] 00:53, 28 December 2007 (EST)
::Maybe we should ask Ed Poor about the appropriateness of the examples:
:::"Ed Poor doesn't know the first thing about Meteorology or Atmospheric Science. I suggest he go back and start from the basics; Lesson 1) Those white things in the sky? They're called ''clouds''. Can you say ''clouds''?"
::If someone had said that about me I would want it deleted, not put on display. The same goes for Graham's "shot". I can ''maybe'' (and that's a big maybe) understand keeping deragatory remarks about Conservapedia, but keeping personal insults?
::I think we should get rid of all of the examples, lest this page become a focus point for anyone who wants to find out what others think are wrong with Conservapedia.
::Thanks for fixing the links and unprotecting. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:16, 28 December 2007 (EST)