9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 01:28, December 29, 2007
, 01:28, December 29, 2007no edit summary
:CP has continued to both grow and fill out articles. Pop culture is not our primary concern, but that area has been growing as well. While we certainly have areas where continued improvement is sought, many of the predictions of doom sounded in debate pages back around February and March are rather laughable when read today. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 01:53, 27 December 2007 (EST)
:CP has continued to both grow and fill out articles. Pop culture is not our primary concern, but that area has been growing as well. While we certainly have areas where continued improvement is sought, many of the predictions of doom sounded in debate pages back around February and March are rather laughable when read today. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 01:53, 27 December 2007 (EST)
:I do understand that CP is a good idea(the conservative versiion of wikipedia) but really it hasnt met my standards of any wiki(the information on it is too short) I wish that CP can shadow other wikis and (as learn together stated) become what wikipedia should have been ANd stay that way. Another question is manifested through this conclusion though; How?-Serg1 07:27, 28 december 2007