Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 513: Line 513:     
:: No, User:Order, I'm not confused but the Wikipedia entry is designed to create confusion in the [[liberal]] direction.  American citizens are American citizens, not "another country"-American.  As to the 1% figure, please do your own research on [[Google]] before criticizing work done by others.  Surely I don't have to explain how to compare the sites mentioning "Thomas Nast" and those claiming he was a "German-American".--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:54, 28 December 2007 (EST)
 
:: No, User:Order, I'm not confused but the Wikipedia entry is designed to create confusion in the [[liberal]] direction.  American citizens are American citizens, not "another country"-American.  As to the 1% figure, please do your own research on [[Google]] before criticizing work done by others.  Surely I don't have to explain how to compare the sites mentioning "Thomas Nast" and those claiming he was a "German-American".--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 20:54, 28 December 2007 (EST)
 +
: Obviously, you want to have 100 entries before the end of the year, and I can understand that you are reluctant to remove this item, but let me still answer to your comments.
 +
:First, if you make a 1% claim, you will have to provide evidence. This is not criticizing the work of others, it is inquiring where to find the work of others. So, from what you say you used Google for you research. What were your search terms? Up to which page did you go?
 +
:Second, I did some google for the term "German-American", and it seems all hits on the first page and 74 of the hundred hits use "German-American" in the meaning of "Americans of German descent". This use seem to be the most common.
 +
:Finally, a presidential committee including Thomas Nast as German-American seems to be very relevant. Is there anything wrong about that report?
 +
:[[User:Order|Order]] 21:57, 28 December 2007 (EST)
    
==What's Wrong With Bias?==
 
==What's Wrong With Bias?==
2,002

edits

Navigation menu