Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
102 bytes added ,  19:47, December 29, 2007
improved
Line 5: Line 5:  
This would be, in its way, admirable. However, in current use, affirmative action goes beyond this, often mandating the use of quotas for setting aside jobs or a portion of college entrance positions for each minority (including also some "minorities" which are actually majorities). In effect, this means selecting applicants by the color of their skin, precisely what the original concept of non-discrimination forbids.  This is sometimes called "reverse discrimination," although this term is rather contradictory - discrimination remains discrimination.
 
This would be, in its way, admirable. However, in current use, affirmative action goes beyond this, often mandating the use of quotas for setting aside jobs or a portion of college entrance positions for each minority (including also some "minorities" which are actually majorities). In effect, this means selecting applicants by the color of their skin, precisely what the original concept of non-discrimination forbids.  This is sometimes called "reverse discrimination," although this term is rather contradictory - discrimination remains discrimination.
   −
''[[Regents v. Bakke]]'' effectively outlawed this "sometimes called 'reverse discrimination.'"
+
''[[Regents v. Bakke]]'' effectively outlawed [[quotas]] but allowed '''affirmative action''' as long as there are considerations other than race.  This is sometimes called reverse discrimination."
    
[[Dinesh D'Souza]] wrote:
 
[[Dinesh D'Souza]] wrote:
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,204

edits

Navigation menu