Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 327: Line 327:     
JakeC is correct.  Those "entries" were originally (back in July) added as a single numbered point[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&diff=prev&oldid=221970], and remained that way until fairly recently (three weeks ago), when they were inadvertently (it would appear) altered as part of a reformatting effort to put spaces between the hashes and the first character[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&diff=next&oldid=346123], but in this case put them between the hashes and the asterisks.  I've fixed it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:14, 30 December 2007 (EST)
 
JakeC is correct.  Those "entries" were originally (back in July) added as a single numbered point[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&diff=prev&oldid=221970], and remained that way until fairly recently (three weeks ago), when they were inadvertently (it would appear) altered as part of a reformatting effort to put spaces between the hashes and the first character[http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia&diff=next&oldid=346123], but in this case put them between the hashes and the asterisks.  I've fixed it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:14, 30 December 2007 (EST)
 +
P.S.  The last one ("In response to this criticism...") was always a separate point, so that's the way I've left it.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 07:15, 30 December 2007 (EST)
    
== Another example of Wikipedia silliness ==
 
== Another example of Wikipedia silliness ==
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu