Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 16:38, December 31, 2007

241 bytes added ,  16:38, December 31, 2007
→‎Holy cow! Elkman blocked everyone who uses my IP range: no apology, right?
Line 360: Line 360:  
: I see, though, that Elkman got overruled, if I'm reading it correctly.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:37, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 
: I see, though, that Elkman got overruled, if I'm reading it correctly.  [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 06:37, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 
::Yes. It wasn't an official overruling, but the majority opinion was against him. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 11:22, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 
::Yes. It wasn't an official overruling, but the majority opinion was against him. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 11:22, 31 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
::: And no apology, right?  It's amazing to me how [[Wikipedia]] causes so much harm and almost never apologies or admits it was wrong.  I guess that is the [[atheistic]] culture.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:38, 31 December 2007 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,530

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/361405"

Navigation menu