240
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 85:
Line 85: + + + + +
→When even Creationist sites disagree...: So far, you have called me a liberal, an evolutionist, a provocateur, and now my 150+ edits are low-quality?
::::: And you didn't answer my question about "biased and inappropriate labeling by evolutionists".
::::: And you didn't answer my question about "biased and inappropriate labeling by evolutionists".
::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:21, 1 January 2008 (EST)
::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:21, 1 January 2008 (EST)
:::::...okay, now I ''am'' offended, Andy.
:::::If my edits so far (155 ''mainspace'' edits in less than two weeks, spent to improve the style of articles and actively seek to find references for unreferenced articles; and don't even get me started on things like pointing out copyright violations, suggesting redirects, and providing insight about style issues) are so bad as to get me ''blocked'', then so be it.
:::::However, it appears to me that you're simply resorting to open threats now since I looked through your diversionary tactics of using personal attacks to distract from your inability to come up with a good argument. So if I get blocked, it will be because you are unwilling or unable to admit that you are wrong. And that block itself will be proof that you need to use your sysop powers (or gently nudge somebody else into doing so) to win a content discussion that was started in good faith.
:::::If - for some reason - these are really my Famous Last Words (*sniff*), then I want to give Philip a friendly pat on the back here. I wish you the best, man, and thanks for everything. :) That would be all. --[[User:JakeC|JakeC]] 22:44, 1 January 2008 (EST)