Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 120: Line 120:  
==I intend to delete the Definitions section...==
 
==I intend to delete the Definitions section...==
 
...unless someone can provide a great reason not to.  Terms such as "life" should be handled by linking to the Life article, "UFO" is just an acronym and should be expanded (once) in the text, and so on.  {{unsigned|Ga ohoyt}}
 
...unless someone can provide a great reason not to.  Terms such as "life" should be handled by linking to the Life article, "UFO" is just an acronym and should be expanded (once) in the text, and so on.  {{unsigned|Ga ohoyt}}
 +
:It does seem a bit out of place in an encyclopedia article, and in that sense I wouldn't mind it going.  However, it doesn't take a lot of space, and I guess the point is that some of the terms (particularly, for example, "race") are or might be used in a particular way in this article that a simple link to another article will not adequately cater for.
 +
:I guess what it comes down to is, don't casually delete the section, but check for each definition whether it is necessary or not.  On "UFO", for example, you are correct, it doesn't need to be in a definitions section.
 +
: This article was largely written by TerryH, so try and ensure that he gives feedback on your suggestion before acting (though that is not to suggest that he has the final say on it).
 +
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:38, 2 January 2008 (EST)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu