nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
902
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 133:
Line 133: + + + + + + +
sure thing!
: Feebasfactor, I don't have time to hunt down every link that someone puts up on a talk page. I've got other issues to address. If you can't explain the "flaws" in Hoyle's work in your own words here, then forget about it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:06, 2 January 2008 (EST)
: Feebasfactor, I don't have time to hunt down every link that someone puts up on a talk page. I've got other issues to address. If you can't explain the "flaws" in Hoyle's work in your own words here, then forget about it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:06, 2 January 2008 (EST)
::Ok, sure thing!
::*"Archaeopteryx bones have tiny bumps where the feathers were attached to the bones by ligaments. This was unexpected, so impossible to attribute to a forgery."
::*Limestone often forms unique dendritic (tree-like) patterns throughout; these patterns match up on both slabs.
::*The skeleton's vertebrae and pelvis indicate that a unique lung design - avian air sacs - was already present in Archaeopteryx, despite being supposedly the earliest bird. Modern analysis of the skull also indicate was remarkably present to that of modern day birds. These are not things an evolutionists would like to imply in a forgery!
::Keep in mind, these aren't my arguments at all - after all, I'm no paleontologist! I'm merely reiterating/paraphrasing the arguments from those more knowledgeable, like the authors at [[Answers in Genesis]]. In case you want to check their factuality, their sources and references are also listed in the link I gave - but of course, I can always look for more sources, or more arguments, if you'd like. [[User:Feebasfactor|Feebasfactor]] 22:23, 2 January 2008 (EST)