58
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 39:
Line 39: + +
Debate:Bias in conservapedia (view source)
Revision as of 01:11, January 4, 2008
, 01:11, January 4, 2008→Examples of Bias in Conservapedia
16. Conservapedia argues against Wikipedia on the basis that when discussing political candidates it tends to contain information that presents conservative politicians in a negative light while ignoring similar information for liberal politicians. Conservapedia has the same modus operandi but in reverse and to the extreme. If one looks at the Hillary Clinton page, most of the information there discusses scandals or failures but does not provide any examples of accomplishments. The page on Mike Huckabee is entirely positive and had no information about recent information until an informed individual added it. Conservapedia fails to present all politicians in equally positive and negative light.
16. Conservapedia argues against Wikipedia on the basis that when discussing political candidates it tends to contain information that presents conservative politicians in a negative light while ignoring similar information for liberal politicians. Conservapedia has the same modus operandi but in reverse and to the extreme. If one looks at the Hillary Clinton page, most of the information there discusses scandals or failures but does not provide any examples of accomplishments. The page on Mike Huckabee is entirely positive and had no information about recent information until an informed individual added it. Conservapedia fails to present all politicians in equally positive and negative light.
17. Conservapedia allows users to write opinions and clearly subjective statements if it is in accordance with conservative beliefs. When one attempts to remove blanket statements and clear opinions without sources, conservapedia promptly returns them.