Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:  
Most [[conservative]]s accept and advocate voluntary charitable giving as necessary to alleviate social problems, and believe government should not interfere, but rather should encourage personal involvement and personal giving to the underprivileged, elderly, disabled, and other hardship cases.  Also, many conservatives view some forms of government mandatory compulsory giving as an impingement on personal rights, unjust expropriation of property, fosters irresponsible social conduct and a disincentive for personal involvement to alleviate social problems.
 
Most [[conservative]]s accept and advocate voluntary charitable giving as necessary to alleviate social problems, and believe government should not interfere, but rather should encourage personal involvement and personal giving to the underprivileged, elderly, disabled, and other hardship cases.  Also, many conservatives view some forms of government mandatory compulsory giving as an impingement on personal rights, unjust expropriation of property, fosters irresponsible social conduct and a disincentive for personal involvement to alleviate social problems.
   −
[[Liberal]]s generally support income redistribution based on their belief that individual charitable giving cannot be relied upon and tends to advocate some degree of compulsory redistribution of resources as necessary. Also, mandatory giving creates jobs for bureaucrats, dependent constituencies as electoral bases, and legitimizes [[class warfare]].
+
[[Liberal]]s generally support income redistribution based on their belief that individual charitable giving cannot be relied upon and tends to advocate some degree of compulsory redistribution of resources as necessary.  
   −
Examples of government programs performing compulsory income redistribution include [[welfare]] and [[progressive taxation]].
+
Examples of government programs performing compulsory income redistribution include [[welfare]] and [[progressive taxation]]. There is strong evidence that increased redistribution of wealth results in better outcomes for health, happiness and crime - as for instance in the Scandinavian countries, which have highly progressive tax regimes.[http://www.epolitix.com/EN/MPWebsites/Clare+Short/d3785575-2c3d-4112-8234-a56172981f30.htm]
    
==External Links==
 
==External Links==
26

edits

Navigation menu