Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
263 bytes added ,  15:07, January 5, 2008
Please work with us - not against us - to present both sides of the HPV vaccine controversy
Line 135: Line 135:     
: We can pick this up more tomorrow.  The entry should remain factual without misleading claims.  The vaccine's effect may be short-lived, for example, as monitoring seems to have been intentionally brief.  Also, it appeared to me that you kept deleting the reference to a lack of epidemiological studies.  See you tomorrow.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:22, 5 January 2008 (EST)
 
: We can pick this up more tomorrow.  The entry should remain factual without misleading claims.  The vaccine's effect may be short-lived, for example, as monitoring seems to have been intentionally brief.  Also, it appeared to me that you kept deleting the reference to a lack of epidemiological studies.  See you tomorrow.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 00:22, 5 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
::Schultz, I love ya but you have to remember that CP is not Wikipedia. We don't tolerate suppression of information merely on the grounds that it "advances a POV". Please work with us - not against us - to present both sides of the [[HPV vaccine controversy]].
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
    
<references/>
 
<references/>
Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650

edits

Navigation menu