13
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 110:
Line 110: + + Line 149:
Line 151: + +
no edit summary
:Because that doesn't assist the ideological bent of said statement.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 11:33, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
:Because that doesn't assist the ideological bent of said statement.--[[User:Dave3172|Dave3172]] 11:33, 11 April 2007 (EDT)
The reason is that they do not want to think that it is a vaccine that prevents all STDs and should use whatever protection they choose to use. It's saying that it does not guarantee "safe sex."[[User:Midnus|Midnus]]
== Article Title ==
== Article Title ==
Or maybe we could tuck it away somewhere and work on it for a week until it's ready. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:20, 5 January 2008 (EST)
Or maybe we could tuck it away somewhere and work on it for a week until it's ready. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 10:20, 5 January 2008 (EST)
The MSNBC source contradicts the line that says the pain causes fainting, MSNBC says "it’s not clear whether the pain of the cervical cancer vaccine was the reason for the reaction [fainting]." [[User:Midnus|Midnus]]
==Dubious claims from liberal newsmagazine==
==Dubious claims from liberal newsmagazine==