19
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + +
Debate:The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter? (view source)
Revision as of 19:44, January 6, 2008
, 19:44, January 6, 2008Comment
: Oh, but for the purposes of this site, if you don't totally agree with the sysops, you are most certainly a liberal. You have got it, here though; too much on this site relies on this sort of Manichaean dichotomy between 'us' and 'them'. Well done for realising ;).[[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]
: Oh, but for the purposes of this site, if you don't totally agree with the sysops, you are most certainly a liberal. You have got it, here though; too much on this site relies on this sort of Manichaean dichotomy between 'us' and 'them'. Well done for realising ;).[[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]
::I am a libertarian socialist (code for "vaguely realistic anarchist") and more liberal than any Democrat. Yes, that also translates to some extent as the ironic "fiscally conservative proponent of a welfare state", but there are ways to acheive such a thing...the main thing for me is the right of the individual, above either goverment or corporation. Might call me a Jeffersonian Republican or something like that. [[User:Anmeris|Anmeris]] 14:44, 6 January 2008 (EST)
"Totally agree with the sysops?" Heck, it's obvious that a lot of the sysops don't even agree with each other a lot of the time! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:14, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
"Totally agree with the sysops?" Heck, it's obvious that a lot of the sysops don't even agree with each other a lot of the time! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:14, 19 April 2007 (EDT)