Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
left one out
Line 84: Line 84:     
==Religious Response==
 
==Religious Response==
−
Online Christian criticism brands the trilogy overly [[atheist]],<ref>[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58341]</ref> [[pantheism|pantheist]]<ref>[http://www.facingthechallenge.org/pullman.php]</ref> or [[humanist]].[http://literarycatechist.blogspot.com/2007/11/his-dark-materials.html]</ref> It has also come under heavy fire from several [[Christian]] groups, most famously the Catholic League, who called for a Christian boycott of the film adaptation.<ref>[http://catholicleague.org/catalyst.php?year=2007&month=October&read=2322]</ref>
+
Online Christian criticism brands the trilogy overly [[atheist]],<ref>[http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58341]</ref> [[pantheism|pantheist]]<ref>[http://www.facingthechallenge.org/pullman.php]</ref> or [[humanist]].<ref>[http://literarycatechist.blogspot.com/2007/11/his-dark-materials.html]</ref> It has also come under heavy fire from several [[Christian]] groups, most famously the Catholic League, who called for a Christian boycott of the film adaptation.<ref>[http://catholicleague.org/catalyst.php?year=2007&month=October&read=2322]</ref>
 
There are some Christian supporters of the books, most notably Rowan Williams, the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]].<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2004/03/17/bodark17.xml]</ref>
 
There are some Christian supporters of the books, most notably Rowan Williams, the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]].<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/arts/main.jhtml?xml=/arts/2004/03/17/bodark17.xml]</ref>
  
SkipCaptcha, nsSupply_SidersR, nsSupply_Siders_
8,436

edits

Navigation menu