| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" | | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:left" |
| | |+ | | |+ |
| − | == '''U.S. Supreme Court Cases''' == | + | == '''[[U.S. Supreme Court]] Cases''' == |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | ! Case !! Decision Summary | + | !Case!!Decision Summary |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | ''[[ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish]]'' (1989) | + | |''[[ASARCO Inc. v. Kadish]]'' (1989) |
| − | || [[U.S. Supreme Court]] restated [[Rooker-Feldman doctrine]] that 28 U. S. C. § 1257 ordinarily bars direct review in lower federal courts of decision reached by highest state court; such authority is vested solely in the U.S. Supreme Court. | + | |Restated [[Rooker-Feldman doctrine]] that 28 U. S. C. § 1257 ordinarily bars direct review in lower federal courts of decision reached by highest state court; such authority is vested solely in the U.S. Supreme Court. |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | ''[[Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman]]'' (2007) | + | |''[[Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman]]'' (2007) |
| − | || the 5-4 United States Supreme Court overturned death penalty; found a reasonable likelihood that trial judge's instructions to Texas jury that sentenced defendant to death prevented jurors from giving meaningful consideration to constitutionally relevant mitigating evidence. | + | |The 5-4 ruling overturned the [[death penalty]]; found a reasonable likelihood that trial judge's instructions to Texas jury that sentenced defendant to death prevented jurors from giving meaningful consideration to constitutionally relevant mitigating evidence. |
| | |- | | |- |
| | | ''[[Abington School District v. Schempp]]'' (1963) | | | ''[[Abington School District v. Schempp]]'' (1963) |
| − | || [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that compulsory school prayer is unconstitutional. | + | |Held that compulsory school prayer is unconstitutional. |
| | |- | | |- |
| | | ''[[Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Ed.]]'' (1977) | | | ''[[Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Ed.]]'' (1977) |
| − | || [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held public-sector unions constitutionally prohibited from using fees of objecting nonmembers for ideological purposes not germane to union's collective-bargaining duties. | + | |Held public-sector unions constitutionally prohibited from using fees of objecting nonmembers for ideological purposes not germane to union's collective-bargaining duties. |
| | |- | | |- |
| | | ''[[Abrams v. United States]]'' | | | ''[[Abrams v. United States]]'' |
| − | ||
| + | | |
| | |- | | |- |
| | | ''[[Abstention doctrine]]'' | | | ''[[Abstention doctrine]]'' |
| − | || Allows [[federal courts]] to refrain from hearing [[lawsuits]] under a variety of circumstances that concern possible interference with other proceedings. | + | |Allowed [[federal courts]] to refrain from hearing [[lawsuits]] under a variety of circumstances that concern possible interference with other proceedings. |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | ''[[Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena]]'' (1995) | + | |''[[Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena]]'' (1995) |
| − | || Decision by [[U.S. Supreme Court]] holding government affirmative action programs to an exacting "strict scrutiny"; requires invalidating them unless justified to remedy past discrimination. | + | |Held government affirmative action programs to an exacting "strict scrutiny"; requires invalidating them unless justified to remedy past discrimination. |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | ''[[Aguilar v. Felton]]'' (1985) | + | |''[[Aguilar v. Felton]]'' (1985) |
| − | || [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held the ;;Establishment Clause'' prohibits governmental financial assistance to parochial schools. | + | |Held the [[Establishment Clause]] prohibits governmental financial assistance to parochial schools. |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | ''[[Alaska v. United States]]'' (2005) | + | | ''[[A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States]]'' (1935) |
| − | || Nearly unanimous [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held against a claim asserted by state of [[Alaska]] to certain submerged lands underlying waters in [[Southeast Alaska]], including lands in between and fringing the southeastern Alaska islands known as the [[Alexander Archipelago]]. | + | |Struck down regulations that fixed the hours and wages of individuals employed by an intrastate business because the activity being regulated related to interstate commerce only indirectly. |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | ''[[Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons]]'' | + | |''[[Alaska v. United States]]'' (2005) |
| − | ||Presents a question to [[U.S. Supreme Court]] concerning [[Federal Tort Claims Act]]. | + | |Nearly unanimously held against a claim asserted by state of [[Alaska]] to certain submerged lands underlying waters in [[Southeast Alaska]], including lands in between and fringing the southeastern Alaska islands known as the [[Alexander Archipelago]]. |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | ''[[Allen v. Illinois]]'' (1986) | + | |''[[Ali v. Federal Bureau of Prisons]]'' |
| − | || [[U.S. Supreme Court]] held that privilege against self-incrimination does not protect person in medication hearing because it is a civil proceeding. | + | |Presents a question to Supreme Court concerning [[Federal Tort Claims Act]]. |
| | |- | | |- |
| − | | + | |''[[Allen v. Illinois]]'' (1986) |
| | + | |Held that privilege against self-incrimination does not protect person in medication hearing because it is a civil proceeding. |
| | + | |} |
| | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] | | [[category:United States Supreme Court Cases]] |
| | [[category:United States Supreme Court]] | | [[category:United States Supreme Court]] |
| | [[Category:United States law]] | | [[Category:United States law]] |