Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Suggestion for a major re-write
Line 546: Line 546:  
Perhaps we should consider branching this off into subarticles? [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:58, 29 December 2007 (EST)
 
Perhaps we should consider branching this off into subarticles? [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 14:58, 29 December 2007 (EST)
 
:It ''is'' pretty indigestible at the moment. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 15:13, 29 December 2007 (EST)
 
:It ''is'' pretty indigestible at the moment. [[Image:User Fox.png]] [[User:Fox|Fox]] <small>([[User talk:Fox|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Fox|contribs]])</small> 15:13, 29 December 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
== Suggestion for a major re-write ==
 +
 +
This article delivers virtually no information about the Operation itself. It covers mostly background, justification and aftermath. These are all very worthy subjects but it seems that they have crowded out facts about the subject matter, i.e. who invaded what, when, how and why. If length is an issue (which it probably is), then topics such as justification and aftermath can be summarised and then split off into decent sub-articles. As it stands, somebody wishing to read about Operation Iraqi Freedom doesn't get any of the basic details about the subject. [[User:Ajkgordon|Ajkgordon]] 13:40, 7 January 2008 (EST)
511

edits

Navigation menu