nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 24:
Line 24: +
→No new genetic info?: Not false, but now linked.
The statement that "mutations that create new genetic information have never been observed" is simply false, unless you're using some unusual definition of genetic information, in which case that should be explained. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 21:55, 7 January 2008 (EST)
The statement that "mutations that create new genetic information have never been observed" is simply false, unless you're using some unusual definition of genetic information, in which case that should be explained. [[User:Dadsnagem2|Dadsnagem2]] 21:55, 7 January 2008 (EST)
:No, it's not false, and I would consider it a usual use of "information", although not the meaningless (literally) definition that evolutionists often use (i.e. any change (except perhaps a deletion) is by definition new information). However, I do take your point that the definition wasn't explained. As a partial answer to that, I've linked "information", and although that article doesn't specifically mention ''genetic'' information, it's better than nothing. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 04:24, 8 January 2008 (EST)