3
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 45:
Line 45: + + + +
no edit summary
In a speech to the Anti-Defamation League, Jones said that "had I decided the Dover matter in a different way, I would have then engaged in just the kind of judicial activism which critics decry," stating that he was bound by "over a half century of strong legal precedents."<ref>http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/speech_judge_jones.asp</ref>
In a speech to the Anti-Defamation League, Jones said that "had I decided the Dover matter in a different way, I would have then engaged in just the kind of judicial activism which critics decry," stating that he was bound by "over a half century of strong legal precedents."<ref>http://www.adl.org/Civil_Rights/speech_judge_jones.asp</ref>
Most opposition to this theory comes from notable scientists like Richard Dawkins, who claim, correctly that "intelligent design" is not a true scientific theory but a creation of religious figures who seek to discredit evolution. Intelligent design is a new term given to creationism, to attempt to disguise religious beliefs as scientific arguments.
It has been pointed out that you can see evolution at work in any laboratory, and in hospitals with the development of new "super bugs" such as golden staff.
== Organizations and Internet Resources ==
== Organizations and Internet Resources ==