Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7:
Line 7: + + Line 197:
Line 199: + +
Talk:American Government Final Exam (view source)
Revision as of 04:17, January 11, 2008
, 04:17, January 11, 2008two excellent scores
Please grade. Thanks. [[User:Cmh|Cmh]] 22:28, 10 January 2008 (EST)
Please grade. Thanks. [[User:Cmh|Cmh]] 22:28, 10 January 2008 (EST)
: 47/50!!!!! THAT'S AWESOME!!!! You should be teaching. I'll post the answer key in a few days, after others have a chance to try.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:17, 10 January 2008 (EST)
==Took a shot==
==Took a shot==
50. The “legislative veto” gave Congress the power to veto or invalidate an action taken by the President, such as a decision to deport an illegal alien. The legislative veto was in nearly 200 federal statutes until it was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in INS v. Chadha (1983). What doctrine do you think the U.S. Supreme Court used to invalidate it?
50. The “legislative veto” gave Congress the power to veto or invalidate an action taken by the President, such as a decision to deport an illegal alien. The legislative veto was in nearly 200 federal statutes until it was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in INS v. Chadha (1983). What doctrine do you think the U.S. Supreme Court used to invalidate it?
<br>(c) separation of powers.
<br>(c) separation of powers.
:: 45/50, also an awesome score!!!! I'm very, very impressed. I'll post the answer key after some others have a chance. You raise some good discussion points also, but let's wait a few days before discussing because it will give away the answers.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:17, 10 January 2008 (EST)