| Line 4: |
Line 4: |
| | == Developing the Theory == | | == Developing the Theory == |
| | | | |
| − | Continental drift was hotly debated off and on for decades following Wegener's death before it was largely dismissed as being eccentric, preposterous, and improbable. However, beginning in the 1950s, a wealth of new evidence emerged to revive the debate about Wegener's provocative ideas and their implications. In particular, four major scientific developments spurred the formulation of the plate-tectonics theory: (1) demonstration of the ruggedness and youth of the ocean floor; (2) confirmation of repeated reversals of the Earth magnetic field in the geologic past; (3) emergence of the seafloor-spreading hypothesis and associated recycling of oceanic crust; and (4) precise documentation that the world's earthquake and volcanic activity is concentrated along oceanic trenches and submarine mountain ranges. | + | Continental drift was hotly debated off and on for decades following Wegener's death before it was largely dismissed as being eccentric, preposterous, and improbable. However, beginning in the 1950s, a wealth of new evidence emerged to revive the debate about Wegener's provocative ideas and their implications. In particular, four major scientific developments spurred the formulation of the plate-tectonics theory: (1) demonstration of the ruggedness and youth of the ocean floor; (2) confirmation of repeated reversals of the Earth magnetic field in the geologic past; (3) emergence of the sea floor-spreading hypothesis and associated recycling of oceanic crust; and (4) precise documentation that the world's earthquake and volcanic activity is concentrated along oceanic trenches and submarine mountain ranges. |
| | | | |
| | == Ocean floor mapping == | | == Ocean floor mapping == |
| Line 32: |
Line 32: |
| | | | |
| | The magnetic stripe reversals are believed by mainstream scientists to have occurred over millions of years. | | The magnetic stripe reversals are believed by mainstream scientists to have occurred over millions of years. |
| − | However, creationist Dr. [[Russell Humphreys]] predicted that magnetic reversals would be found with timeframes of days or weeks, from having occurred during the Flood. | + | However, creationist Dr. [[Russell Humphreys]] predicted that magnetic reversals would be found with time frames of days or weeks, from having occurred during the Flood. |
| | In an example of a successful creationists prediction, scientists subsequently found magnetic reversals that had taken place over the space of 15 days.<ref>Snelling, Andrew A., [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1233/ Fossil magnetism reveals rapid reversals of the earth’s magnetic field], ''Creation'' 13(3):46–50, June 1991.</ref> | | In an example of a successful creationists prediction, scientists subsequently found magnetic reversals that had taken place over the space of 15 days.<ref>Snelling, Andrew A., [http://www.creationontheweb.com/content/view/1233/ Fossil magnetism reveals rapid reversals of the earth’s magnetic field], ''Creation'' 13(3):46–50, June 1991.</ref> |
| | | | |