2,002
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 506:
Line 506: +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 04:03, January 12, 2008
, 04:03, January 12, 2008→Example number 14
::::::::: "Wisdom", the point here concerns the prior smear by Wikipedia, which you seem unwilling to acknowledge. And as to your choosing the name "Wisdom", is there an innocent explanation for that, or is it another [[liberal]] attempt to appear smarter than [[conservatives]]??--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:00, 11 January 2008 (EST)
::::::::: "Wisdom", the point here concerns the prior smear by Wikipedia, which you seem unwilling to acknowledge. And as to your choosing the name "Wisdom", is there an innocent explanation for that, or is it another [[liberal]] attempt to appear smarter than [[conservatives]]??--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:00, 11 January 2008 (EST)
::::::::::I am bit confused about what the smears exactly is, but it seems like you take case with the assertion that you were ''criticized'' for the unscientific derivation, and not with the label ''unscientific'' itself. We all agree that the figure ''is hardly based on solid numbers'', we all agree that it is ''unscientific''. The smear seem to be to suggest that this is ''criticism'', while it it is simply a ''fact'', and Andy was apparently the first who made this observation. I agree, Wikipedia should take out the ''critics'', and simply state that the numbers are unscientific and hardly based on solid numbers, without any reference to the critics. [[User:Order|Order]] 23:03, 11 January 2008 (EST)