281
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 3:
Line 3: − +
→How can one state that evolution is a good theory on a website that accepts bibilican creation as fact?
== How can one state that evolution is a good theory on a website that accepts bibilican creation as fact? ==
== How can one state that evolution is a good theory on a website that accepts bibilican creation as fact? ==
This very website has been popularly quoted because it accepts the true, Biblical origin of species on this planet. If this really is a conservative knowledgebase, is it not reasonable to present the conservative view on a subject, given that there are many reputable conservative creation scientists that agree with my work as I presented it? My edit should be reinstated, in line with the philosophy of this website.
This very website has been popularly quoted because it accepts the true, Biblical origin of species on this planet. If this really is a conservative knowledgebase, is it not reasonable to present the conservative view on a subject, given that there are many reputable conservative creation scientists that agree with my work as I presented it? My edit should be reinstated, in line with the philosophy of this website.--[[User:BillOReillyFan|BillOReillyFan]] 21:52, 14 March 2007 (EDT)