Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 44:
Line 44: + +
Conservapedia:Sysop complaint documentation (view source)
Revision as of 01:49, January 13, 2008
, 01:49, January 13, 2008my 2 cents
:::::::I freely admit that putting the edit back in was a foolish move (and pretty much asking for trouble), but I would also guess that Andy's actions were motivated by more than just his sysop duties in that case. That being said, I definitely know better than to dig deeper into the Shaken Baby Syndrome here. :)
:::::::I freely admit that putting the edit back in was a foolish move (and pretty much asking for trouble), but I would also guess that Andy's actions were motivated by more than just his sysop duties in that case. That being said, I definitely know better than to dig deeper into the Shaken Baby Syndrome here. :)
:::::::PS: Our entry for [[Quack]] lists QuackWatch under the External Links... it was added by sysop Karajou. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 20:44, 12 January 2008 (EST)
:::::::PS: Our entry for [[Quack]] lists QuackWatch under the External Links... it was added by sysop Karajou. --[[User:Jenkins|Jenkins]] 20:44, 12 January 2008 (EST)
It's all in how you phrase it. Try saying that "X disagrees with Y about Z." That's the formula that usually works on a wiki. But don't edit war over it. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 20:49, 12 January 2008 (EST)