Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Medical boards (view source)

Revision as of 02:39, January 14, 2008

914 bytes added ,  02:39, January 14, 2008
improved
Line 5: Line 5:  
*[[California]] (except for fees charged for services never performed)
 
*[[California]] (except for fees charged for services never performed)
 
*[[Tennessee]]
 
*[[Tennessee]]
 +
 +
== [[Judicial immunity]] ==
 +
 +
Most [[federal]] Courts of Appeals have found that medical board examiners have [[judicial immunity]] from suits brought against them for their conduct in license suspension proceedings:
 +
 +
* ''Mishler v. Clift'', 191 F.3d 998 (9th Cir. 1999)
 +
* ''Ostrzenski v. Seigel'', 177 F.3d 245 (4th Cir. 1999)
 +
* ''O'Neal v. Miss. Bd. Of Nursing'', 113 F.3d 62 (5th Cir. 1997)
 +
* ''Wang v. N.H. Bd. of Registration in Med.'', 55 F.3d 698 (1st Cir. 1995)
 +
* ''Watts v. Burkhart'', 978 F.2d 269 (6th Cir. 1992) (en banc)
 +
* ''Bettencourt v. Bd. of Registration in Med.'', 904 F.2d 772 (1st Cir. 1990)
 +
* ''Horwitz v. State Bd. of Med. Exam'rs'', 822 F.2d 1508 (10th Cir. 1987)
 +
* ''Applewhite v. Briber'', 506 F.3d 181 (2d Cir. 2007)
 +
 +
A decision rejecting [[judicial immunity]] for a summary suspension of a license is ''DiBlasio v. Novello'', 344 F.3d 292 (2d Cir. 2003).
    
[[category:medicine]]
 
[[category:medicine]]
 +
[[Category:Judicial Immunity]]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/370557"

Navigation menu