Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 391:
Line 391: + + + + + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Commandments (view source)
Revision as of 02:55, March 15, 2007
, 02:55, March 15, 2007Commandment #1 needs to be clarified in the article.
== My Prosecutor ==
== My Prosecutor ==
Frankly, I'm very curious about the site and very much appreciate TRUE conservatism. However the sheer ridiculousness of this site is overwhelming. TO think that you could provide my IP address to my local prosecutor (snicker) AND expect them to do something about hurting your feelings or violating some internal code is actually very amusing. You are far more likely to have my prosecutor (here called a Crown Prosecutor, but try the RCMP first because they refer eveidence) call you and ask you to stop harrassing them. Just silly.
Frankly, I'm very curious about the site and very much appreciate TRUE conservatism. However the sheer ridiculousness of this site is overwhelming. TO think that you could provide my IP address to my local prosecutor (snicker) AND expect them to do something about hurting your feelings or violating some internal code is actually very amusing. You are far more likely to have my prosecutor (here called a Crown Prosecutor, but try the RCMP first because they refer eveidence) call you and ask you to stop harrassing them. Just silly.
== Commandment #1 needs to be clarified in the article. ==
Commandment #1 needs to be clarified in the [[Conservapedia Commandments]] article.
Here is commandment #1:
Everything you post must be true and verifiable.
I think we need to specify that verifiable means you provide a footnote. For example, I believe the a [[Scopes Trial]] article is poor because it has no footnotes. I think it would force Conservapedians to do better work if "verifiable" was clarified. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:55, 14 March 2007 (EDT)conservative