| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | ==History== | | ==History== |
| | | | |
| − | Evolutionary psychology obviously has deep roots with [[Charles Darwin]] and his theory of evolution. But the connection is deeper than that. Darwin is sometimes described as the first evolutionary psychologist. In the closing pages of his work [[The Origin of Species]] he states: | + | Evolutionary psychology obviously has deep roots with [[Charles Darwin]] and his theory of evolution. But the connection is deeper than that. Darwin is sometimes described as the first evolutionary psychologist. In the closing pages of his work ''[[The Origin of Species]]'' he states: |
| | | | |
| | <blockquote>"In the distant future I see open fields for far | | <blockquote>"In the distant future I see open fields for far |
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
| | However, most of psychology took a very different path for the next 60 years focusing on [[behavioral psychology]], while [[evolutionary biology]] focused mainly on [[macroevolution | mechanisms of evolution]] and united [[genetics]] and evolution. Several important individuals in psychology and biology however tried to accomplish what Darwin had pointed to. | | However, most of psychology took a very different path for the next 60 years focusing on [[behavioral psychology]], while [[evolutionary biology]] focused mainly on [[macroevolution | mechanisms of evolution]] and united [[genetics]] and evolution. Several important individuals in psychology and biology however tried to accomplish what Darwin had pointed to. |
| | | | |
| − | William James in his book [[Principles of Psychology]] focused a create deal on instincts and advocated a [[functionalism | functionalist]] approach to psychology. [[Ronald Fisher | RA Fisher]] the famous [[statistician]] and evolutionary biologist as well as [[J. B. S. Haldane]] helped define a mathematical base for many of the ideas that would later come to dominate evolutionary psychology. | + | William James in his book ''[[Principles of Psychology]]'' focused a great deal on instincts and advocated a [[functionalism | functionalist]] approach to psychology. [[Ronald Fisher | RA Fisher]] the famous [[statistician]] and evolutionary biologist, as well as [[J. B. S. Haldane]], helped define a mathematical base for many of the ideas that would later come to dominate evolutionary psychology. |
| | | | |
| − | During the peak of the [[cognitive revolution]] in psychology two very important works were published. The first was [[George C. Williams]]' [[Adaptation and Natural Selection]] in 1964, this was an extremely important book in evolutionary biology, it advocated a gene-centric view of evolution and used mathematical models to demonstrate that currently vogue theories of [[group selection]] where impossible. Two years later in 1966 [[W.D. Hamilton]] would use the concepts of gene-centric evolution to argue that evolution could support development of traits that did not directly favor the individual. This would become known as [[inclusive fitness]] and [[Hamilton's rule]] would later serve as bedrock for future work in evolutionary psychology. | + | During the peak of the [[cognitive revolution]] in psychology two very important works were published. The first was [[George C. Williams]]' ''[[Adaptation and Natural Selection]]'' in 1964. This was an extremely important book in evolutionary biology; it advocated a gene-centric view of evolution and used mathematical models to demonstrate that currently vogue theories of [[group selection]] were impossible. Two years later in 1966 [[W.D. Hamilton]] would use the concepts of gene-centric evolution to argue that evolution could support development of traits that did not directly favor the individual. This would become known as [[inclusive fitness]] and [[Hamilton's rule]] would later serve as bedrock for future work in evolutionary psychology. |
| | | | |
| − | The 1970s brought about the first recognizably modern research in evolutionary psychology. One significant development was the publication by evolutionary biologist [[Robert Trivers]] on his theories of [[reciprocal altruism]], [[parental investment theory]], and [[parent-offspring conflict]]. All of these ideas made use of Williams' and Hamilton's work. Another important event was [[E.O. Wilson]]'s publication of [[Sociobiology]]. Wilson's work attempted to explain such mysterious of evolution as the [[peacock's tail]] and the social structure of [[ants]]. He also advocated the explanations he found be applied to human behavior. His ideas were highly controversial and received a lot of political backlash, though the scientific community was mostly positive. | + | The 1970s brought about the first recognizably modern research in evolutionary psychology. One significant development was the publication by evolutionary biologist [[Robert Trivers]] on his theories of [[reciprocal altruism]], [[parental investment theory]], and [[parent-offspring conflict]]. All of these ideas made use of Williams' and Hamilton's work. Another important event was [[E.O. Wilson]]'s publication of ''[[Sociobiology]]''. Wilson's work attempted to explain such mysterious of evolution as the [[peacock's tail]] and the social structure of [[ants]]. He also advocated the explanations he found be applied to human behavior. His ideas were highly controversial and received a lot of political backlash, though the scientific community was mostly positive. |
| | | | |
| | In many ways sociobiology is very similar to evolutionary psychology, but with the size of the political pressure and negative press surrounding sociobiology the term fell out of favor in the early 80s. Focus shifted from studying the evolutionary adaptiveness of specific behaviors, to studying the adaptiveness of the mechanisms which produce those behaviors. Many students and proponents started using the term evolutionary psychology. This would become the more accepted phrase. | | In many ways sociobiology is very similar to evolutionary psychology, but with the size of the political pressure and negative press surrounding sociobiology the term fell out of favor in the early 80s. Focus shifted from studying the evolutionary adaptiveness of specific behaviors, to studying the adaptiveness of the mechanisms which produce those behaviors. Many students and proponents started using the term evolutionary psychology. This would become the more accepted phrase. |
| Line 23: |
Line 23: |
| | Most of the early work focused on demonstrating that the core belief in a universal human nature that could be elucidated from an evolutionary perspective was a viable idea. [[David Buss]] did a cross cultural study that examined 32 groups all over the world to show that there was a gender difference in preferences for short-term mates, but remarkable similarity for long-term mates. This prediction actually stemmed from evolutionary ideas of Trivers and concepts such as [[Bateman's principle]]. This dataset was also important because it showed that even a diverse range of cultures shared a common psychology. | | Most of the early work focused on demonstrating that the core belief in a universal human nature that could be elucidated from an evolutionary perspective was a viable idea. [[David Buss]] did a cross cultural study that examined 32 groups all over the world to show that there was a gender difference in preferences for short-term mates, but remarkable similarity for long-term mates. This prediction actually stemmed from evolutionary ideas of Trivers and concepts such as [[Bateman's principle]]. This dataset was also important because it showed that even a diverse range of cultures shared a common psychology. |
| | | | |
| − | By the 1990s the field had expanded considerably and gained a lot of recognition. Several Journals dedicated to evolutionary psychological research were started including [[Evolution and Human Behavior]] which is run by the [[Human Behavior and Evolution Society]]. | + | By the 1990s the field had expanded considerably and gained a lot of recognition. Several Journals dedicated to evolutionary psychological research were started, including ''[[Evolution and Human Behavior]]'' which is run by the [[Human Behavior and Evolution Society]]. |
| | | | |
| | ==Basics of the field== | | ==Basics of the field== |
| Line 36: |
Line 36: |
| | | | |
| | *The conscious mind is only a small part of psychology - Most of psychology now recognizes that there is an extensive [[unconscious]] mind that can control behavior and motivation. One does not have to know why he is doing something in order to do it, or even really ware of what he is doing. Proponents of evolutionary psychology believe that much of the "why" is hidden from conscious thought. | | *The conscious mind is only a small part of psychology - Most of psychology now recognizes that there is an extensive [[unconscious]] mind that can control behavior and motivation. One does not have to know why he is doing something in order to do it, or even really ware of what he is doing. Proponents of evolutionary psychology believe that much of the "why" is hidden from conscious thought. |
| − | *The mind is domain-specific not domain-genera - Evolutionary psychologist believe that the mind is made up of modular elements that evolved separately to address separate problems. This is opposed to thinking of the mind as a general problem solving system with out specific domains of processing. | + | |
| | + | *The mind is domain-specific not domain-general - Evolutionary psychologist believe that the mind is made up of modular elements that evolved separately to address separate problems. This is opposed to thinking of the mind as a general problem solving system with out specific domains of processing. |
| | | | |
| | ===Adaptationist perspective and functional design=== | | ===Adaptationist perspective and functional design=== |