Changes

In ''Darlak v. Bobear'', 814 F.2d 1055, 1061 (5th Cir. 1987), a physician who was suspended from a state hospital sued state officials under [[Section 1983]], and requested that the hospital rescind his suspension. The court held that plaintiff's claim was one for prospective injunctive relief, and was therefore not barred by the [[Eleventh Amendment]]. ''Id.'' at 1061. ''See also'' M. Schwartz & J. Kirklin, Section 1983 Litigation: Claims, Defenses and Fees -- 1989 Cumulative Supplement No. 1 § 6.5 (1989) (numerous cases cited, holding that reinstatement of  public employees is prospective rather than retroactive relief).

In '''''Darlak v. Bobear''''', 814 F.2d 1055, 1061 (5th Cir. 1987), a [[physician]] who was suspended from a state [[hospital]] sued state officials under [[Section 1983]], and requested that the hospital rescind his suspension. The court held that [[plaintiff]]'s claim was one for prospective injunctive relief, and was therefore not barred by the [[Eleventh Amendment]]. ''Id.'' at 1061. ''See also'' M. Schwartz & J. Kirklin, Section 1983 Litigation: Claims, Defenses and Fees -- 1989 Cumulative Supplement No. 1 § 6.5 (1989) (numerous cases cited, holding that reinstatement of  public employees is prospective rather than retroactive relief).

 

[[category:Circuit Cases]]

[[category:Circuit Cases]]

[[category:Section 1983]]

[[category:Section 1983]]

[[category:Eleventh Amendment]]

[[category:Eleventh Amendment]]