Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)

Revision as of 04:33, January 15, 2008

894 bytes added ,  04:33, January 15, 2008
reply
Line 550: Line 550:     
:::I wrote some of Wikipedia's "smear", and I didn't quote anything other than "tactical advice". [[User:Paisan30|Paisan30]] 23:22, 14 January 2008 (EST)
 
:::I wrote some of Wikipedia's "smear", and I didn't quote anything other than "tactical advice". [[User:Paisan30|Paisan30]] 23:22, 14 January 2008 (EST)
 +
 +
:::: You're not making sense.  Wikipedia's unsubstantiated smear includes (as an example) the statement that "issues gave tactical advice to right-wing militia groups and advanced various conspiracy theories."  You've cited nothing to justify the smear of "right-wing", and you've shown nothing to justify the inflammatory statement that this "gave tactical advice," which has military-like connotations.  In fact, what you describe does not appear to be "advice" at all, but merely a factual description of club rules of interest for various proper reasons.
 +
 +
:::: If you wrote that sentence "issues gave tactical advice to right-wing militia groups and advanced various conspiracy theories," then you should consider becoming a fulltime smear artist on Wikipedia.  It's clever in the way that it smears the reputation of a good man.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:33, 14 January 2008 (EST)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,350

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/371674"

Navigation menu