Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
699 bytes added ,  18:19, January 15, 2008
Line 14: Line 14:  
However, in putting the agreement in writing, CMI claims that AiG subsequently effectively rewrote it, reneging on the verbal agreement.
 
However, in putting the agreement in writing, CMI claims that AiG subsequently effectively rewrote it, reneging on the verbal agreement.
 
CMI have intimated that they will resume the legal proceedings.<ref>[http://www.creationontheweb.biz/?page=breakdown Breakdown]</ref>
 
CMI have intimated that they will resume the legal proceedings.<ref>[http://www.creationontheweb.biz/?page=breakdown Breakdown]</ref>
 +
 +
While Answers in Genesis has chosen to not discuss the lawsuit on their website, they do offer a perspective into the decision to create separate organizations and state that while there were philosophical differences in how the organizations were to be run, that both organizations continue to have the same belief in Creationism and the parting was due to how to best present that message.  AiG also discusses the discontinuation of ''Creation'' magazine in favor of ''Answers''.<ref>http://www.answersingenesis.org/about/history</ref>
 +
 +
As is common in disputes where no resolution has been found, the presentations of CMI and AiG in describing what occurred have a different emphasis on events.
    
== References ==
 
== References ==
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu