162
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: + + +
no edit summary
: Not here. Go to [[Wikipedia]] for that National-Enquirer stuff. We have more significant things to discuss and learn here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:38, 4 January 2008 (EST)
: Not here. Go to [[Wikipedia]] for that National-Enquirer stuff. We have more significant things to discuss and learn here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:38, 4 January 2008 (EST)
Whats interesting here is that this is considered gossip and ignored by the conservapedia junta and considered "not serious" despite a chief of police testifying about it. However I am almost certain that if it was a claim against say, Barack Obama, it would no doubt receive criticism. Rebuttal?
[[MetcalfeM]]
== Keep goin Huck! ==
== Keep goin Huck! ==
I added this to the article, but I wanted to say that [http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/2008/01/08/hillary-clinton-john-mccain-take-early-lead-in-new-hampshire-primary/ despite finishing third] in the Republican Primary, I expect Huck to pull it out in the long run! [[South Carolina]] has always been kind to social conservatives and openly evangelical candidates!-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 00:44, 9 January 2008 (EST)
I added this to the article, but I wanted to say that [http://youdecide08.foxnews.com/2008/01/08/hillary-clinton-john-mccain-take-early-lead-in-new-hampshire-primary/ despite finishing third] in the Republican Primary, I expect Huck to pull it out in the long run! [[South Carolina]] has always been kind to social conservatives and openly evangelical candidates!-[[User:MexMax|MexMax]] 00:44, 9 January 2008 (EST)