Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 27: Line 27:     
*I have noticed far too many articles changed, and the attribution for the so-called "facts" direct the user to a Wikipedia entry, oftentimes written by the same person making the changes here. Shouldn't those types of "documentation" be disallowed?  I posted this elsewhere, but feel perhaps this is the better place for it. --[[User:TK|TK]] 00:42, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 
*I have noticed far too many articles changed, and the attribution for the so-called "facts" direct the user to a Wikipedia entry, oftentimes written by the same person making the changes here. Shouldn't those types of "documentation" be disallowed?  I posted this elsewhere, but feel perhaps this is the better place for it. --[[User:TK|TK]] 00:42, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:South Park has had a huge affect on American society in general, and has been praised for taking on social issues. In the last episode (a new one is on in 15 minutes), they used the N-word 43 times, to great applause. It has a huge audience. It's notable, and I suspect the only reason removal has been proposed is it's vulgarity. I mean, there needs to be a distinction between "hollywood gossip" and truly notable stuff; Lord of the Rings is notable. Harry Potter is notable. South Park is notable. When I think non-notable, I think something really, really obscure; the person who was cast as "frightened child #7" in an art-house movie a decade ago. --<font color="#0000CC" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:Hojimachong|'''Hojimachong''']]</font><sup><font color="00FFAA">[[User_Talk:Hojimachong|talk]]</font></sup> 00:46, 15 March 2007 (EDT)
     
4,542

edits

Navigation menu