nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 152:
Line 152: + + + + + + + +
→China: So many claims, so little evidence that they are true.
And secondly, you say China's advances only became what we know as chemistry in Medival Europe is semantics. Chemistry is only word. The Chinas were excellent astromers and chemists no matter what word you use and Chinese rulers frequently had people on their staff to research and report to them on their findings. Which is science.
And secondly, you say China's advances only became what we know as chemistry in Medival Europe is semantics. Chemistry is only word. The Chinas were excellent astromers and chemists no matter what word you use and Chinese rulers frequently had people on their staff to research and report to them on their findings. Which is science.
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]]
[[User:MetcalfeM|MetcalfeM]]
: You've offered no evidence that creationary scientists will ignore data any more than evolutionary scientists.
: Where in this article does it state that "non-christian scientists ignore creation based evidence (or at least distort this data) in order to prove Old earth and the like"? They do, but I couldn't quickly see where this article says this.
: "''...creation science was largely discredited ...''": No, it was dismissed, not discredited.
: "''...christian science will routinly bedunk any science that openly contradicts their own beliefs.''": You mean ''creation'' science, but what's wrong with that?
: "''Scientists are not part of an athestic movement with the sole purpose of discrediting creation and the like.''": Nobody claimed that. You wouldn't be trying to refute a straw-man argument, would you?
: "''Just because their research doesnt match a chritian POV doesnt mean the data has been deliberatly distorted that way.''": Again, that's not what is claimed.
: "''And secondly, you say China's advances ...''": No, that wasn't me saying that. That was someone else reviewing a book by Rodney Stark, an agnostic I believe.
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 00:07, 18 January 2008 (EST)