Changes

In ''Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.'', 544 U.S. 528 (2005), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] developed a more complex test for determining if a price-control regulation constitutes a "taking" requiring compensation under the [[Fifth Amendment]].

In '''''Lingle v. Chevron U.S.A. Inc.''''', 544 U.S. 528 (2005), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] developed a more complex test for determining if a price-control regulation constitutes a "taking" requiring compensation under the [[Fifth Amendment]].

Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] wrote the opinion for a nearly unanimous Court, with only Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]] concurring separately.  Justice O'Connor held that:

Justice [[Sandra Day O'Connor]] wrote the opinion for a nearly unanimous Court, with only Justice [[Anthony Kennedy]] concurring separately.  Justice O'Connor held that: