Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 598:
Line 598: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 20:04, January 18, 2008
, 20:04, January 18, 2008→The main premise of Wikipedia.: reply
I thought Wikipedia was for the most part unbiased, then I came here and realized they were biased...against shabby articles with outdated unverifiable sources, and against hate crime.
I thought Wikipedia was for the most part unbiased, then I came here and realized they were biased...against shabby articles with outdated unverifiable sources, and against hate crime.
Thus Conservapedia was born. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 13:56, 18 January 2008 (EST)
Thus Conservapedia was born. --[[User:Rainedaye|Rainedaye]] 13:56, 18 January 2008 (EST)
: "Rainedaye", you have 11 edits here, and they are all talk, talk, talk. No substantive edits. Let me guess: you're another [[liberal]], right? Oh how [[liberals]] love to talk, talk, talk. It's so obvious.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 15:04, 18 January 2008 (EST)
== Sudden Jihad Syndrome ==
== Sudden Jihad Syndrome ==