Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
a beginning
Two medical organizations have submitted briefs to the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] insisting that [[gun control]] is good for public health.<ref>http://www.gurapossessky.com/news/parker/documents/07-290acAmericanPublicHealthAssociation.pdf</ref><ref>
http://www.gurapossessky.com/news/parker/documents/07-290tsaAmerican%20Academy.pdf</ref>

Are they right? This essay, which welcomes suggestions by others, looks at the logic and evidence of the impact of [[gun control]] on public health.

== Fallacies in Arguments Made by the Medical Groups ==

(will address later)

== Headline text ==


== Sources ==

* Roland H. Beason, "COMMENTARY: Printz Punts on the Palladium of Rights: It Is Time to Protect the Right of the Individual to Keep and Bear Arms," 50 Ala. L. Rev. 561 (Winter, 1999)
* http://www.jpands.org/hacienda/edcor6.html (the benefit of firearms for public health)
* http://www.jpands.org/hacienda/comm12.html (Gun death statistics from [[CDC]])
* http://www.jpands.org/hacienda/comm13.html (collecting cases on Second Amendment)
* http://www.jpands.org/hacienda/wheeler1.html (when pediatricians become politicians)
[[category:Essay]]
Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790

edits

Navigation menu